FG FINE ART LTD

Master of 1416
Florence, active first quarter of the 15th century
The two panels originally formed the pinnacles of the lateral compartments of a triptych depicting the Virgin and Child with two angels, flanked by Saints John the Baptist, Bernard, Michael the Archangel, and Bartholomew now in Museum Poldi Pezzoli in Milan.


Announcing Angel and Virgin Annunciate
ca. 1410-1415
Tempera on panel, 20.4 x 20.5 cm; 20.2 x 21 cm
PROVENANCE
USA, Kleinberger Galleries, 1917
Florence, art market, ante 1993
Private collection
BIBLIOGRAPHY
O. Sirén, M.W. Brockwell, Catalogue of a Loan Exhibition of Italian Primitives in aid of the American War Relief, New York 1917, pp. 29-30
B. Berenson, Quadri senza casa. Il Trecento fiorentino, IV, in “Dedalo”, XII, 1932, p. 22
F. Zeri, Sul catalogo dei dipinti toscani del secolo XIV nelle Gallerie di Firenze, in “Gazette des Beaux-Arts”, LXXI, 1968, p. 71
S. Chiodo, in Da Bernardo Daddi al Beato Angelico a Botticelli: dipinti fiorentini del Lindenau-Museum, exhibition catalogue, Florence 2005, p. 121
S. Weppelmann, Lorenzo di Niccolò e la bottega del “Maestro del 1416”, in Nuovi studi sulla pittura tardogotica. Intorno a Lorenzo Monaco, conference proceedings, Livorno 2007, p. 121
S. Topi, Il Maestro del 1416: un personaggio minore del primo Quattrocento fiorentino, in “Arte Cristiana”, XCVI, 2008, pp. 424-425
M. Mazzalupi, Un caso di metodo: gli affreschi di Prato e la giovinezza di Paolo Uccello, in Da Donatello a Lippi. Officina pratese, exhibition catalogue, Milan 2013, p. 72
M. Bassi, in L’Arte del Dono. Da Gian Giacomo Poldi Pezzoli a oggi, exhibition catalogue, Cinisello Balsamo 2022, pp. 30–31

Master of 1416, Virgin and Child with Two Angels among Saints John the Baptist, Bernard, Michael the Archangel, and Bartholomew, Milan, Poldi Pezzoli Museum (1917 photograph prior to the removal of the pinnacles and frame).
The most recent studies on the Milanese painting have paid insufficient attention to the removal of the Announcing Angel and Virgin Annunciate, a separation that has left clear traces on their state of conservation. These two panels resurfaced on the Florentine art market prior to 1993, as noted in a handwritten note found on the back of a photograph in the Federico Zeri Photographic Archive in Bologna. Recognising these panels as part of the Poldi Pezzoli triptych has been a significant scholarly achievement, allowing for the partial restoration of the original coherence of the work, which had been long lost.
In the catalogue for the Kleinberger Galleries exhibition (fig. 1), Osvald Sirén and Maurice W. Brockwell attributed the triptych to Jacopo di Cione, suggesting an overly early date in the mid-to-third quarter of the 14th century. However, Bernard Berenson later identified it as the work of a close follower of the Florentine painter Lorenzo di Niccolò, a Florentine painter, highlighting in it “the style of the conscious Gothic of the late century, a grace and sweetness that surpass even Spinello and lean more toward Lorenzo Monaco”.
Building on Berenson’s observations, Federico Zeri in 1968 attributed the triptych to an anonymous artist he named as the Master of 1416. This identification was based on the date inscribed on another significant work attributed to this artist, the Madonna and Child with Saints Peter, John the Baptist, Anthony Abbot, and Julian, housed in the Galleria dell’Accademia in Florence. Around this cornerstone piece, Zeri grouped other paintings, all dating to the first two decades of the 15th century. He identified the artist as one who, beginning his career under Lorenzo di Niccolò within the neo-Giottesque tradition of late 14th century Florence, was influenced by the international style ushered in by Gherardo Starnina’s return from Spain and his collaboration with Lorenzo Ghiberti and Lorenzo Monaco.
Zeri’s attribution of the triptych to the Master of 1416 has since gained universal acceptance among scholars. While some emphasized the close connection between this artist’s work and the later output of Lorenzo di Niccolò, it has been suggested by others that the anonymous artist could have been identified with Lorenzo di Niccolò himself in his final phase. However, as proposed by Sonia Chiodo, it seems more plausible that the Master of 1416 should be identified as Lorenzo’s nephew, Bartolomeo di Piero. Registered with the Arte dei Medici e Speziali in 1412, Bartolomeo was active in Florence and noted in 1427 as the head of a family workshop alongside his cousin Piero, Lorenzo di Niccolò’s son. Drawing on this insight, Stefan Weppelmann proposed that the extensive body of work attributed to the Master of 1416 was likely produced within the workshop of Bartolomeo di Piero and Piero di Lorenzo. This aligns with the well-documented practice of their family workshops in 15th century Florence and may explain some of the subtle stylistic variations observed in their works.
Stylistic and chronological considerations make it challenging to support Matteo Mazzalupi’s hypothesis, which proposes that this triptych might correspond to the altarpiece mentioned in Ser Giusto d’Anghiari’s diary on 23 March 1449. The entry describes the piece as “from the workshop of Piero di Lorenzo,” commissioned earlier by the military leader Gregorio d’Anghiari for the high altar of the Abbey of San Bartolomeo in Anghiari. If this hypothesis were correct, it would require a significant reassessment of the entire catalogue of the Master of 1416, placing it in a decidedly more conservative position.
A full fact sheet is available on request.
